1.2
Trends in the European exhibition industry
All over Europe, the advent of television led to a dramatic fall in
the number of cinema admissions, which fell from 2,900 million for the
whole EU region in 1960 to 570 million in 1990. The main result of this
fall was a drastic reduction in the number of screens in all countries:
from over 37,000 in 1960 to 16,650 in 1990 (2).
The fall in admissions outstripped the fall in capacity, and as more and
more screens closed down, the average number of admissions per screen also
kept falling.
Not all countries reacted to the new situation with the same speed,
nor with the same solutions. In some countries, like Italy and the United
Kingdom, the main result was a reduction and decay of the cinema sector.
In the UK, the 1980's saw a major restructuring of the industry with a
large scale programme of construction of multiplex cinemas. In Italy, where
the single screen cinemas are still the majority, the renovation process
has been supported since 1980 by a state policy. In other countries, like
Germany and France, many large cinema theatres were split into smaller
units. In France cinemas were modernised in the 1970's with substantial
help from a comprehensive system of levies and subsidies, whereas in Germany
it was largely the initiative of cinema owners to update and modernise
facilities.
Charting the trends in the European exhibition industry
Several studies have been undertaken which analyze the developments
and discuss the role that multiplexes play in reversing that trend. The
main studies which are worth discussing here are:
1 Retailing European Films: the Case of the European Exhibition Industry,
a Report by London Economics for the MEDIA Business School, 1993.
2 Il cinema Italiano: Imprenditorialità, Efficienza, Innovazione,
SDA-Bocconi, 1992, chapter 4 by Giuseppe Delmestri.(3)
3 The Consequences of 2.5 Years of New Multi-screens in Germany",
published in the Dutch trade journal, "Film", J.Ph. Wolff, June 1993, and
On Multiplexes and Multi-screens, J.Ph. Wolff, November 1993.(3)
4 Cinemas in Europe: Circuit building and Multiplexes, Screen
Digest, July 1991.
5 UK Multiplex Cinemas: Phase 1 nears maturity, Screen Digest,
February 1994.
The London Economics/MBS report: Retailing European
Films: the Case of the European Exhibition Industry
The London Economics/MBS report argues that the appearance of multi-screen
facilities in the 1970's in Europe was mainly a response to the changes
in consumer behaviour caused by the greater choice of audio-visual entertainment.
It was also the most efficient way to maximise capacity utilisation, as
exhibitors were no longer able to fill their large theatres. By reducing
the number of seats for each screen and allowing for different screen capacities,
the multi-screen cinemas could make a more efficient use of cinema seats,
moving films to auditoria of appropriate size.
These attempts were partly successful at containing the fall in admissions,
although they did not manage to reverse the trend. Moreover, the decline
in admissions throughout Europe did not result in lower average ticket
prices. As discussed in the report, cinema became altogether a more up-market
product, since the lower-price cinemas out of town centres were the first
ones to close down, leaving cinemas to compete with all the other forms
of entertainment available downtown.
A more successful reaction to the changes in the sector appeared in
the early 1980s with the multiplex. It is characterised by state of the
art technology and greater comfort for the viewer. It re-establishes the
supremacy of cinema over television by offering a degree of comfort and
choice comparable to television, coupled with superior viewing technology.
The report suggests that multiplexes have been successful because they
offer:
-
increased choice: more people are able to find the film of their first
choice and many can go to a second choice film if the first is not available;
-
ability to reduce risks by switching films to appropriate capacity levels;
and
-
ability to offer an up-market product at a lower marginal cost.
From this perspective, one can see that the multiplex constitutes the natural
development of the multi-screen cinema, at least in some countries. On
the other hand, in the countries which failed to respond earlier to the
challenge posed by television, multiplexes are a totally new concept. The
level of development of the cinema sector prior to the appearance of multiplexes
and the characteristics of each country can interact to determine the extent
to which multiplexes are likely to make a significant impact in each country.
These two dimensions can also help understanding the specific forms that
will be successful in the particular market.
SDA-Bocconi Study: Il cinema Italiano: Imprenditorialità,
Efficienza, Innovazione
It has often been argued that multiplexes are more likely to increase
audiences in areas where there are not many other screens. They are claimed
to be more effective in attracting audiences where they offer a large number
of screens in relation to the variety of different audiences (younger,
older, more middle-class etc.).
According to a study by the SDA-Bocconi on the Italian exhibition sector
(4), in countries where
there has been no response by exhibitors to change for a long time, multiplexes
were able to boost admission levels over what would be expected from screen
density. At present, since the demand for cinema has reached the stage
of maturity, the exhibitors' strategy is that of catering for different
segments of the market. This explains the simultaneous development of different
types of multiplexes. Some complexes, mainly American style, are geared
towards a very young audience, and offer fast and easy access to a good
number of films whilst providing additional space for entertainment. Others
seek to attract more adults, by emphasising the up-market, theatre-like
feel and look of their auditoria (Germany) or are integrated in greater
multi-media facilities (eg in France). More than one type of audience is
now present and more than one type of cinema should be available within
a given country. As a consequence, the ability to increase admissions is
the ability to respond to tastes that were not previously catered for.
The SDA-Bocconi study analyses three significant countries, France,
Germany and the UK, in order to draw a life cycle of cinema as a product.
The phases of the product cycle and corresponding cinema types are:
|
cinema as a social and cheap vehicle to dreamland; typical cinema
site: large theatrical sites |
|
variety, offering as much choice as television; typical cinema site:
cinemas split into a number of smaller units |
|
comfort, re-establishing technological superiority of cinema over TV;
typical cinema site: high tech and efficient, more expensive and
comfortable |
-
development / segmentation
|
going to the movies as a social event; typical cinemasite: keeping
the high technological standards, cinemas emphasise the importance of the
look and feel of the site, its common space and ancillary services. Many
types are possible. |
In a comment on the present situation in Germany the study states that
the boost in admissions created by the multiplexes in the UK is considered
with caution by Germans. German exhibitors believe that the success story
in the UK cannot be replicated in a region where, unlike Britain before
the advent of multiplexes, the density and quality of screen is already
at high levels.
The German debate: The Consequences of 2.5 Years
of New Multi-screens in Germany
Over the last two years the congress of HDF - the German Exhibitors'
Association(5) has debated
vigorously the impact of multiplexes. Between 1991 and the end of 1992,
the number of screens in cinemas with more than nine screens - the definition
adopted by Dr Bähr of the German Film support agency, the FFA - increased
from 14 to 90. Seven multiplexes have opened in that time period. The great
debate has been over:
-
the threat this new form of outlet poses to the established cinema sector;
and
-
the impact of multiplexes on overall admissions.
Nobody disputes the enormous impact that these very large projects have
had in the towns where they opened. It appears that the argument is largely
one about the extent of the impact on the exhibition sector and the degree
to which multiplexes continue to attract more admissions, rather than a
question of whether they had any impact at all.
The paper by Dr Bähr deals with the analysis of the five regions
in which multiplexes opened. It attempts to disentangle the effect of multiplexes
on regional admissions and estimate the existence of multiplexes versus
other cinemas. Table 1 below is an informative summary
from a comment by Dr Wolff. It summarises the effects on admissions in
index form. The crucial figures are the enormous increase in admissions
in those regions which include multiplexes (plus 40-42% over 1989) against
a significant decrease in the remaining regions of West Germany (minus
12%). This paper also demonstrates the drop in admissions for the existing
cinemas in five regions with new multiplex cinemas (between 22% and 66%).
Table 1
Admissions in Germany
|
|
West Germany
|
The five regions with new multi-screens
|
Remaining West Germany
|
adm.
|
index
|
adm.
|
Index
|
Adm.
|
index
|
1989
|
101.55m |
100
|
7.8m
|
100
|
93.74m
|
100
|
1991
|
106.96m |
105.3
|
10.96m
|
140.3
|
96m
|
102.4
|
1992
|
93.54m |
92.1
|
11.15m
|
142.7
|
82.39m
|
87.9
|
SOURCE: J.Ph. Wolff - FFA |
Another significant picture emerges from the paper by Bähr, which
shows the level of admissions per screen on a monthly basis. Firstly, multi-screen
cinemas have a much higher admission level, almost double that of the average
cinema. Secondly, there appears to be similar volatility in the admissions
for multiplexes. Finally, the trend for multiplexes is upward, while the
rest of the sector appears to be on a slightly downward trend.
Screen Digest Survey: Cinemas in Europe: Circuit
building and Multiplexes
The impact of multiplexes on admissions is also the focus of a survey
on the most developed multiplex park in Europe, the UK, published in Screen
Digest(6). Here it is
argued that although multiplexes produced a positive net effect, a proportion
of their admissions has clearly been diverted from surrounding conventional
cinemas. The first impact of a new multiplex is likely to last around a
year, during which the surrounding sites suffer most of the damage. But
after the initial shock, business could well start to grow for both. In
Britain independents have survived, and the number of screens not owned
by major chains has actually increased by 11 units from 1989 to 1990, although
there is no doubt that their share of total admissions is being progressively
squeezed.
Screen Digest Survey: UK Multiplex Cinemas
The growth of UK multiplexes over recent years is the subject of a
newly published Screen Digest Survey. This survey asserts that the peak
years of UK multiplex growth were between 1989 and 1991, when more than
100 new screens were opened per year. As shown in Table 2 below, of the
604 screens opened in the UK since October 1985, 371 (approximately 60%)
were built between 1989 and 1991.
Table 2
Growth of UK multiplex cinemas
|
|
Number of screens
|
Growth rate (year on year)
|
1985
|
10
|
n/a
|
1986
|
18
|
80%
|
1987
|
44
|
144%
|
1988
|
139
|
216%
|
1989
|
285
|
105%
|
1990
|
387
|
36%
|
1991
|
510
|
32%
|
1992
|
548
|
7%
|
1993
|
604
|
10%
|
SOURCE: Screen Digest |
This rapid growth in multiplexes has been led by the aggressive expansion
of large multinational companies such as United Cinemas International (UCI)
and Warner Bros. MGM/Cannon, the current market leader in terms of screens
in the UK, has also been moving away from its traditional single screen
sites and is now a major player in the multiplex sector. The other traditionally
very large player in the UK cinema industry, Rank Odeon, has been less
active in the area of multiplexes, primarily due to the fact that it employs
very tough criteria with respect to returns on investment (pay back within
five years). This situation is reflected in the market shares of the multiplex
operators as detailed in Table 3 overleaf.
Table 3
Market shares of multiplex operators (measured by number of multiplex
sites owned)
|
|
1989
|
1993
|
MGM/Cannon |
14%
|
24%
|
Rank Odeon |
3%
|
14%
|
Showcase |
24%
|
14%
|
UCI |
52%
|
32%
|
Warner Bros |
7%
|
15%
|
SOURCE: Screen Digest
Although the rate of growth of multiplexes is now significantly lower
than in these peak years, this does not imply that the UK multiplex sector
is stagnating. On the contrary, Screen Digest estimate that 42 new screens
will be added in 1994 and over 50 in 1995. Moreover, industry sources suggest
that there are suitable sites in the UK for another 20 to 25 multiplexes
(a suitable site is defined as one where 200,000 to 300,000 people live
within a 20 minute drive). This would mean that there could be over 900
multiplex screens in the UK by the end of the decade.
Multiplexes in the European exhibition sector
There is a large degree of inconsistency in the way that multiplexes
are defined in different studies and in different countries. Some believe
that the key factor is the number of screens, but many others also believe
that additional features must be present (eg parking facilities) for a
multi-screen complex to be defined as a multiplex. In its survey of circuit-building
in Europe, Screen Digest describes a multiplex as a "purpose built multiple
screen cinema complex with five or more screens". However, developments
of new screens adjoining or surrounding older ones were considered multiplexes,
while sub-divisions of existing cinemas were not. Notwithstanding the difficulty
of separating screens that are built as additions from those obtained by
partitioning of the original one, in the analysis carried out in this paper
a multiplex is defined as a purpose built multi-screen facility with eight
or more screens.
The following tables show the structure of the European cinema sector
by number of screens and demonstrates the penetration of multiplexes in
various countries in Europe. These tables illustrate a varying picture
of the cinema sector in some of the main EU countries(7).
Belgium (Table 4) and the UK (Table
5) have the highest share of multiplex screens in Europe, with roughly
25%.
France (Table 6) has a high penetration of screens
in cinemas with more than 5 screens. Denmark (Table 7),
the Netherlands (Table 8), Germany (Table
9) and Spain (Table 10) have a relatively low
penetration of multiplex cinemas with more then eight screens, with just
under 5% of screen capacity.
Table 4
Belgium: screen profile
|
|
Sites
|
Screens
|
Share of total screens
|
1 Screen |
75
|
75
|
17.4
|
2 Screens |
25
|
50
|
11.6
|
3-5 Screens |
42
|
155
|
35.9
|
6-7 Screens |
7
|
45
|
10.4
|
8+ Screens |
9
|
106
|
24.6
|
Total multi-screens |
83
|
356
|
82.6
|
TOTAL |
158
|
431
|
100
|
SOURCE: MEDIA Salles: European Cinema Yearbook, 1993
Table 5
The United Kingdom: screen profile
|
|
Sites
|
Screens
|
Share of total screens
|
1 Screen |
329
|
329
|
18.7
|
2 Screens |
108
|
216
|
12.3
|
3-5 Screens |
170
|
585
|
33.3
|
6-7 Screens |
31
|
196
|
11.2
|
8+ Screens |
43
|
431
|
24.5
|
Total multi-screens |
352
|
1428
|
81.4
|
Total |
681
|
1757
|
100
|
SOURCE: MEDIA Salles: European Cinema Yearbook, 1993
Table 6
France: screen profile
|
|
Sites
|
Screens
|
Share of total screens
|
1 Screen |
1424
|
1424
|
32.3
|
2 Screens |
295
|
590
|
13.4
|
3 Screens |
211
|
633
|
14.4
|
4 Screens |
117
|
468
|
10.6
|
5-6 Screens |
153
|
833
|
18.9
|
7+ Screens |
59
|
454
|
10.3
|
Total multi-screens |
835
|
2978
|
67.7
|
Total |
2259
|
4402
|
100
|
SOURCE: MEDIA Salles: European Cinema Yearbook, 1993
Table 7
Denmark: screen profile
|
|
Sites
|
Screens
|
Share of total screens
|
1 Screen |
104
|
104
|
33.1
|
2 Screens |
33
|
66
|
21.0
|
3-5 Screens |
30
|
115
|
36.6
|
6-7 Screens |
2
|
12
|
3.8
|
8+ Screens |
1
|
17
|
5.4
|
Total multi-screens |
66
|
210
|
66.9
|
Total |
170
|
314
|
100
|
SOURCE: MEDIA Salles: European Cinema Yearbook, 1993
Table 8
The Netherlands: screen profile
|
|
Sites
|
Screens
|
Share of total screens
|
1 Screen |
55
|
55
|
13.2
|
2 Screens |
45
|
90
|
21.6
|
3-5 Screens |
68
|
251
|
60.3
|
6-7 Screens |
3
|
20
|
4.8
|
8+ Screens |
0
|
0
|
0
|
Total multi-screens |
116
|
361
|
86.8
|
Total |
171
|
416
|
100
|
SOURCE: MEDIA Salles: European Cinema Yearbook, 1993
Table 9
Germany: screen profile
|
|
Sites
|
Screens
|
Share of Total Screens
|
1 Screen |
1176
|
1176
|
32.4
|
2 Screens |
364
|
728
|
20.1
|
3-5 Screens |
373
|
1304
|
35.9
|
6-7 Screens |
38
|
255
|
7.0
|
8+ Screens |
14
|
167
|
4.6
|
Total Multi-Screens |
789
|
2454
|
67.6
|
Total |
1965
|
3630
|
100
|
SOURCE: MEDIA Salles: European Cinema Yearbook, 1993
Table 10:
Spain: screen profile |
|
Sites
|
Screens
|
Share of total screens
|
1 Screen |
1042
|
1042
|
57.7
|
2 Screens |
72
|
144
|
8.0
|
3-5 Screens |
116
|
429
|
23.7
|
6-7 Screens |
20
|
125
|
6.9
|
8+ Screens |
8
|
67
|
3.7
|
Total multi-screens |
216
|
765
|
42.3
|
Total |
1258
|
1807
|
100
|
SOURCE: MEDIA Salles: European Cinema Yearbook, 1993
As mentioned earlier, the ability of a multiplex to create new admissions
depends to some extent on screen density, i.e. the average number of screens
in a given area of population. The number of inhabitants per screen is
reported in Table 11.
Table 11:
Density of Population
|
COUNTRY |
000s of inhabitants per screen
|
|
1989
|
1992
|
BELGIUM |
21.7
|
23.3
|
DENMARK |
14.4
|
16.4
|
FRANCE |
12.0
|
13.0
|
GERMANY |
19.2 (1)
|
22.1
|
GREECE |
16.0
|
25.4
|
IRELAND |
22.0
|
18.7
|
ITALY |
16.0
|
19.1
|
THE NETHERLANDS |
34.8
|
36.4
|
PORTUGAL |
36.8
|
42.4
|
SPAIN |
21.6
|
21.8
|
UK |
37.6
|
33.5
|
(1) Refers to West Germany only |
SOURCE: MEDIA Salles: European Cinema Yearbook,
1993 |
As Dr Wolff(8) has
pointed out, there is a strong correlation between population density and
screen density throughout Europe (more than 0.8); this certainly explains
why the Netherlands has one of the lowest screen densities: more people
tend to live closer to a screen. Portugal, on the other hand, has a low
screen density because it is underscreened. The UK lies somewhere between
these two extremes.
Two contrasting trends emerge from the data: as some countries are
reducing the density of screens, others are increasing it. Portugal, Greece
and Italy show the most dramatic reduction in the number of screens per
inhabitant. At the opposite end of the spectrum are the UK and Ireland,
which have greatly increased their screen density. Despite the improvement,
the UK still shows among the highest number of inhabitants per screen in
the EU, after Portugal and Holland.
France has by far the highest number of screens per inhabitant. Denmark
comes second, then Ireland and Italy.
Table 12:
Annual Cinema Visits per Capita
|
|
1989
|
1991
|
1992
|
BELGIUM |
1.6
|
1.7
|
1.6
|
DENMARK |
2
|
1.8
|
1.7
|
FRANCE |
2.2
|
2.1
|
2.1
|
GERMANY |
1.7
|
1.5
|
1.3
|
GREECE |
1.7
|
1.0
|
-
|
IRELAND* |
2.0
|
2.1
|
2.2
|
ITALY |
1.6
|
1.5
|
1.4
|
THE NETHERLANDS |
1.1
|
1.0
|
0.9
|
PORTUGAL |
1.2
|
1.1
|
1.2
|
SPAIN |
2.0
|
2.0
|
2.1
|
UK |
1.7
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
* figures for Ireland provided by the Irish Film Institute
SOURCE: MEDIA Salles: European Cinema Yearbook, 1993
The average number of visits to the cinema per person per year has decreased
for most countries from 1989 to 1992. Ireland, Spain and the UK are the
only exceptions. Greece shows a sharp fall in 1989-91. Portugal and Belgium
have maintained their per capita annual frequency.
Generally speaking, we expect a greater number of screens per capita
to generate, on average, a greater number of visits to the cinema. This
is simply because, other things being equal, more people are going to go
to the cinema if it is easily accessible and if the choice of films is
large. However, the level of cinema visits in the UK and Ireland is higher
than the level which is implied by screen density figures - screen density
is clearly not the only factor affecting the frequency with which people
visit the cinema.
Notes:
(2) See MBS-London
Economics, "Retailing European Films: The Case of the European Exhibition
Industry", 1993
(3) A French
and an English version of G. Delmestri's paper is to be published by UNIC
as well as a French translation of J. Ph. Wolff's paper of November 1993.
(4) SDA- Bocconi,
"Il cinema Italiano: Imprenditorialità, Efficienza, Innovazione",
1992 - chapter 4. See also "On Multiplexes and Multi-screens: a Critical
Commentary on Giuseppe Delmestri's Paper" by J. Ph. Wolff, November 1993,
which criticizes some aspects of the above mentioned study by SDA- Bocconi.
(5) We draw
here on the paper presented at the 1993 congress: R.Bähr, "Cinemaxe,
Multiplexe und die Folgen -Nackte Zahlen 21/2" published in Filmecho/Filmwoche
17/93, (the full version published by the FFA) and the response to this
paper by J.Ph. Wolff "The Consequences of 2.5 Years of New Multi-screens
in Germany" translated by the author from the Dutch version published in
the Dutch trade journal, "Film", June 1993.
(6) See Screen
Digest, July 1991. "Cinemas in Europe: Circuit Building and Multiplexes"
(7) The tables
report on all European countries for which complete data on their screen
profile was available.
(8) J.Ph. Wolff,
"In de luwte, uit de luwte. Een economische visie op de bioscoop en
de Europese film" ("In the lee, out of the lee. An economic vision
on cinema and European film"), Amsterdam, December 1993, pages 189-190.